Handling conflicts within projects

The causes for conflicts in projects find their origin in 3 dimensions: individual, team and environment. Understanding the models presented here will help you to see conflicts in a different mode.

Conflicts are not a negative factor when they are applied for what their purpose is in projects. The purpose is to clarify things. The following examples will explain this.

ConflictPurpose
  • A clash of personality
To show that we all are different
  • A clash of culture
To show that each culture (including our own) has its positive and its negative
  • A clash between contractor and sub-contractor
To show that each party has its own view of the truth and that misunderstandings is a part of live.
  • Between steering-committee and the projectmanager
To show that running a project is not an easy task, but also a very responsible task

We could go on, but the message is clear. A conflict gives the members in the team the ability to learn, to gain experience. The projectmanager is responsible for managing the conflicts in his project. He needs an understanding of the needs of the stake-holders in his team or in the environment and also an open ear to all the parties involved in the conflict.

According to Thomas-Kilmann there are 5 conflict handling modes depending on the level of assertiveness and cooperativeness. Each mode has its own advantages and disadvantages. The five modes are: avoiding, competing, compromising, accommodating and collaborating. Each individual has its own preference, knowing them gives light to your effectiveness in certain conflicts.